Compare Analytical Surface Inertness: SilcoNert® 2000 vs. Silonite®

January 31 2014 Process Analytical

describe the image

This study compares the surface inertness of 2 coatings on the inner walls of 1/8” stainless steel tubing: SilcoNert®2000 (SilcoTek®Corporation) and Silonite (Entech Instruments Inc.). The data show significant differences in surface inertness of the two coatings.

Surface Activity Comparison 1 24 14

Test results of 8 common active compounds show the SilcoNert 2000 treated tube is the superior surface for analytical and process sampling. The Silonite surface is drastically more active; exhibiting significant surface activity with very poor resolution of active compounds. For a mildly active compound such as 4-chlorophenol, the SilcoNert 2000 surface showed nearly 6.7 times better response than the Silonite surface. For a more active compound such as 1,6-hexanediol, the SilcoNert 2000 column surface showed a response nearly equal to the response seen on the analytical column alone. With high activity compounds the Silonite column system showed total adsorption of 1,6-hexanediol.

Comparison of inertness

Make your entire analytical system inert!

SilcoTek coatings can be applied to all wetted pathways including:

Injection ports
Glass and steel liners
Tubing
FID jets
Columns
Fittings

Learn more about how SilcoTek can make your analytical system more inert.

Our Coatings

Our Services

By Solution

By Industry

Resources

Latest News

Company

Careers

Company

Address

Compare Analytical Surface Inertness: SilcoNert® 2000 vs. Silonite®

Make your entire analytical system inert!

Related Resources

What can we help you with?

Quick Links

Contact

Subscribe to Email Updates